In this article, we explore the reasons behind this trend, its advantages and challenges, and how companies may plan an effective repatriation strategy.
Why Companies Are Reconsidering the Cloud
Rising Costs
According to a recent IDC report, 80% of organizations using cloud services have reported significant increases in their operational bills over the past three years. A notable example is 37signals, which, after migrating away from AWS, projected savings of over $10 million in five years. This case highlights how storage, data transfer, and licensing costs can exceed initial expectations, particularly for companies with intensive workloads.
Additional Data: Gartner predicts global spending on public cloud services will reach $723 billion by 2025, demonstrating the massive scale of the market while also explaining why many companies are rethinking their initial strategies.
Performance and Latency Issues
A 2024 Uptime Institute study revealed that 27% of companies with critical applications experienced latency issues when relying exclusively on the cloud. For example, GEICO repatriated critical workloads due to these challenges, achieving a 20% improvement in operational performance after moving their data to local servers.
Additionally, financial sector companies like JPMorgan Chase have reduced their reliance on cloud providers to ensure compliance with low-latency requirements.
Data Sovereignty and Privacy
In Europe, regulations like GDPR have driven data repatriation toward local infrastructures. According to Citrix, 25% of organizations in the UK have migrated at least half of their sensitive data out of the public cloud to comply with regulatory requirements.
A relevant case is a multinational healthcare company that repatriated critical data locally to ensure regulatory compliance and avoid risks associated with international data transfers.
Vendor Lock-In Risks
Companies like Adobe have highlighted the challenges of relying on a single cloud provider. By migrating workloads to hybrid infrastructures, they gained flexibility and avoided unexpected fees by diversifying their technological options.
A KPMG report indicates that 34% of companies see vendor lock-in as a key barrier in their cloud strategies.
Benefits of Combining On-Premise and Cloud
- Long-Term Cost Control
The “Trillion Dollar Paradox” report by Andreessen Horowitz highlights how cloud services represent up to 50% of operational costs in large SaaS companies. By repatriating stable workloads, companies may achieve significant long-term savings, as demonstrated by 37signals. - Optimized Performance
Companies requiring low latency, such as those in manufacturing or R&D, benefit from hybrid models where critical applications are hosted locally while other services remain in the cloud. - Security and Regulatory Compliance
Repatriation simplifies the implementation of custom security measures and ensures sensitive data remains within a company-controlled environment. - Integration with Legacy Systems
The on-premise model better suits organizations using legacy technologies, allowing for deep integration without the limitations imposed by many cloud providers.
Real-Life Examples of Companies Returning to On-Premise
Dropbox
In 2016, Dropbox migrated 90% of its data from AWS to its own data centers. This approach not only reduced operational costs but also optimized infrastructure performance to meet its specific needs.
GEICO
The U.S. insurer cited reliability issues and a 2.5x increase in costs as reasons for repatriating workloads. This change enabled the company to implement more customized solutions.
Adobe
Adobe opted for a hybrid model, keeping critical applications on local servers to avoid total dependence on the public cloud.
Challenges of Returning to On-Premise
- Initial Investment: While on-premise infrastructure may be expensive upfront, many companies leverage financial schemes like amortization to distribute costs over time.
- Technical Complexity: A report by The New Stack emphasizes how migrations to local infrastructures may cause temporary disruptions if not carefully planned.
- Scalability: While the on-premise model offers control, expanding capacity can be slower and more expensive compared to a cloud environment.
Strategies for Effective Cloud Repatriation
To ensure a successful migration, companies should:
- Evaluate Current Workloads and Costs
A detailed assessment may identify which workloads are more cost-effective in an on-premise model. According to Puppet, companies that implement early evaluation strategies reduce implementation times by 15%. - Define a Migration Plan
Establish a detailed roadmap that includes stages, resources, and a contingency plan to minimize disruptions. - Train Internal Teams
Ensure IT teams have the necessary skills to manage the repatriated infrastructure or consider collaborating with external partners. - Implement Monitoring Tools
Solutions like Pandora FMS enable companies to monitor transitions in real-time, ensuring stable and safe operations while constantly tracking resource usage to plan for growth and control critical infrastructures.
A Balanced and Flexible IT Future
Combining on-premise and cloud models allows companies to optimize costs and performance while preparing for future challenges. IDC data shows that 80% of companies will adopt a hybrid model by 2025, highlighting the importance of a well-planned strategy.
In an ever-evolving tech landscape, companies must regularly evaluate their infrastructure to ensure it aligns with their strategic and operational goals.
The key to success lies in finding the right balance between performance, costs, and flexibility, ensuring every decision delivers real value to the business.
Beyond limits, beyond expectations
